Case 3311605/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Dutta v Nationwide Security — 2021
- Case reference
- 3311605/2020
- Decision date
- 25 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Dutta
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal considered a Notice and Order sent to the parties on 25 February 2021, which gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why his unfair dismissal and redundancy payment complaints should not be struck out. The stated reason was that the claimant appeared to have insufficient length of service to bring those complaints.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out both the unfair dismissal complaint and the complaint for a redundancy payment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the Tribunal considered the claimant had insufficient length of service to bring the complaint and he did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing after the notice and order sent on 25 February 2021. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | Struck out on the same basis as the unfair dismissal complaint: the Tribunal said the claimant had insufficient length of service and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing after the notice and order dated 25 February 2021. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.