Case 3311605/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Fitzsimons v Walraven Ltd and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 3311605/2021
- Decision date
- 26 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Margo Representation
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs S Fitzsimons
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Reading by Cloud Video Platform on 4 to 5 August 2022, Employment Judge Margo Representation substituted Glenn Cleaning & Support Services Ltd for Glenn Management Ltd as the second respondent. The claims against Walraven Ltd were dismissed.
The tribunal found that Mrs S Fitzsimons was unfairly dismissed by the second respondent. It also found that her claims for notice pay, holiday pay and a redundancy payment succeeded. The notice pay award was £180, calculated as 2 x £90, the holiday pay award was £126, and the redundancy payment was £270, calculated as 3 x £90.
The total award was £1,442.12. That figure included £366.12 for compensation/other expenses resulting from the unfair dismissal and £500 for loss of statutory rights. The basic award was assessed at nil because it was extinguished by the redundancy payment, and no loss of earnings was awarded because the claimant did not seek such a claim.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Glenn Cleaning & Support Services Ltd was substituted for Glenn Management Ltd as the second respondent. The basic award was nil because it was extinguished by the redundancy payment. The unfair dismissal award comprised £366.12 compensation/other expenses and £500 for loss of statutory rights; no loss of earnings was awarded because none was sought. | Upheld | — | £866 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay was awarded in the sum of £180, calculated as 2 x £90. | Upheld | — | £180 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay was awarded in the agreed sum of £126. | Upheld | — | £126 |
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment was awarded in the sum of £270, calculated as 3 x £90. | Upheld | — | £270 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,442
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £866
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.