Case 3311607/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Aljawahiri v Fenwick Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3311607/2022
- Decision date
- 18 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T Aljawahiri
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal only for the purposes of this judgment. It found that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires two years' qualifying service to bring an unfair dismissal complaint, and that the claimant had been employed by the respondent for less than two years.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the claimant was not entitled to bring the unfair dismissal complaint. Having given the claimant an opportunity to provide an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out, and finding that no such reason had been given, the tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint.
The judgment expressly states that the claimant's other complaints were not affected by this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment strikes out only the unfair dismissal complaint on the basis that the claimant had less than two years' service under s.108 ERA 1996. It states that other complaints, if any, are not affected, but does not identify or adjudicate them. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.