Case 3311612/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs. T Lin v Synology UK Ltd OPEN PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2023
- Case reference
- 3311612/2022
- Decision date
- 20 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Boyes
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs. T Lin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt an open preliminary hearing on 16 March 2023 before Employment Judge Boyes, sitting alone at Cambridge by Cloud Video Platform, the tribunal dealt with time-limit issues and case management in Mrs T Lin's claims against Synology UK Ltd.
The unfair dismissal claim was found to have been presented out of time. The tribunal held that it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been made in time, and it therefore had no jurisdiction in respect of the unfair dismissal claim.
The holiday pay claim was also found to have been presented out of time, but the tribunal held that it was not reasonably practicable for it to be presented in time and that it was presented within such further period as the tribunal considered reasonable. The claim was listed for a one-day full merits hearing, with further case management orders to follow. The claimant's complaints of discrimination on the grounds of sex, pregnancy and maternity had been withdrawn at a preliminary hearing on 22 February 2023 and were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim was presented out of time; the tribunal held it was reasonably practicable for it to have been made in time and therefore had no jurisdiction in respect of the unfair dismissal claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim was presented out of time, but the tribunal held that it was not reasonably practicable for it to be presented in time and that it was presented within such further period as the tribunal considered reasonable. It was listed for a one-day full merits hearing. | Other | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Upon withdrawal at the preliminary hearing on 22 February 2023, the complaint was dismissed. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Upon withdrawal at the preliminary hearing on 22 February 2023, the complaint was dismissed. | Withdrawn | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.