Case 3311616/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Gardner v Resolute Inns Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3311616/2021
- Decision date
- 4 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Gardner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to present a response to the claim. Employment Judge Anstis entered judgment in favour of Mr R Gardner on the papers on 4 April 2022.
The tribunal found that the claimant was owed unpaid wages and awarded £2,625.00 in compensation. The judgment records that this was a gross sum and that it would be satisfied if paid on a net basis, with any deductions for tax and national insurance accounted for to HMRC.
The tribunal also awarded the claimant a further £355.00 as compensation for breach of contract. In addition, the judgment states that the respondent had failed to pay holiday pay, but the amount of holiday pay was to be assessed in a separate judgment and was not quantified in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant was owed unpaid wages and awards £2,625.00 in compensation, described as a gross sum payable net with deductions to HMRC. | Upheld | — | £2,625 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment awards a further £355.00 as compensation for breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £355 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,980
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.