Case 3311617/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Gray v JCC Electronics Limited (In Liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 3311617/2020
- Decision date
- 15 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Gray
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that no response had been received to the claimant's claim and entered judgment under Rule 21. It found that Mrs D Gray had been dismissed in breach of contract and awarded damages equivalent to 12 weeks' pay in the sum of £2,640.00.
The tribunal also found that she was entitled to a redundancy payment. It calculated that award by reference to 12 years' service, age 53 at the date of termination, and a weekly wage of £220.00, producing a redundancy payment of £3,850.00. In addition, it found that she had untaken but accrued holiday pay which had not been paid, and awarded £824.00 for that item.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract and awarded damages equivalent to 12 weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £2,640 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal awarded a redundancy payment based on 12 years' service, age 53, and a weekly wage of £220, using the calculation set out in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,850 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant had untaken but accrued holiday pay that had not been paid. | Upheld | — | £824 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,314
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.