Case 3311619/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v No appearance and no ET3 entered. — 2025
- Case reference
- 3311619/2023
- Decision date
- 18 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered a default judgment under Rule 21 because no appearance was made for the respondent and no ET3 had been entered.
The claimant was awarded 2933.00 by way of unlawful deduction of wages. The judgment states that the sum is payable in full as a gross amount by the respondent immediately.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Default judgment entered under Rule 21; written reasons were not provided in the judgment text. | Upheld | — | £2,933 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,933
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.