Case 3311620/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Winczewski v MAM Transport Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3311620/2021
- Decision date
- 25 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dobbie Members
- Venue
- Cambridge
- Panel members
- Mr Vaghela, Mrs Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Winczewski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Cambridge on 17-19 October 2022, before Employment Judge Dobbie sitting with Mr Vaghela and Mrs Smith, the tribunal upheld Mr W Winczewski's unfair dismissal claim and his claim for notice pay. The extracted judgment records those outcomes but does not set out any monetary award figure in the text provided.
The tribunal also dealt with the claimant's wages claim. It upheld that claim only for the period from 22 April 2021 to the date of termination, and dismissed all other claims for wages.
The claimant's race discrimination claim, pleaded as discriminatory dismissal, was not upheld and was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay upheld. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for wages upheld for the period from 22 April 2021 to the date of termination; all other wage claims were dismissed. | Other | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Race discrimination claim based on discriminatory dismissal was not upheld. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.