Case 3311630/2024 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Ms A Farmer (2) Ms C Garratt (3) Ms M Grasso v East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust RECORD OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2025
- Case reference
- 3311630/2024
- Decision date
- 9 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Richard Wood
- Venue
- Private CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Ms A Farmer (2) Ms C Garratt (3) Ms M Grasso
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Record of a Preliminary Hearing heard by CVP on 31 July 2025 before Employment Judge Richard Wood. The parties were represented by Mr J Williams for the claimants and Miss V Dukes for the respondent, East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust.
The judgment records that case number 3311517/2024 was dismissed upon withdrawal by the second claimant. It then states that, in respect of case numbers 3311630/2024, 3311631/2024 and 3311632/2024, the claims of whistleblowing and unlawful deductions from wages were also dismissed upon withdrawal by the respective claimants. No substantive liability findings or remedy awards are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The record states that the whistleblowing claims in case numbers 3311630/2024, 3311631/2024 and 3311632/2024 were dismissed upon withdrawal by the respective claimants. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The record states that the unlawful deductions from wages claims in case numbers 3311630/2024, 3311631/2024 and 3311632/2024 were dismissed upon withdrawal by the respective claimants. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.