Case 3311637/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Midgley v Enterprise Rent-A-Car UK Limited CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Under the provisions of — 2021
- Case reference
- 3311637/2020
- Decision date
- 28 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 30 August 2022, Employment Judge George issued a certificate of correction under rule 69 in case 3311637/2020. The certificate states that the judgment sent to the parties on 28 May 2021 was corrected by removing the case management summary and orders, and that the case management summary sent to the parties on 28 May 2021 was corrected by removing the judgment.
The supplied text does not contain the underlying merits decision, findings of fact, claim outcomes, or any monetary award. It also states that appeal or review time limits were not changed by the certificate and continue to run from the date of the original judgment or original judgment with reasons.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The supplied text is only a certificate of correction and does not state the substantive outcome for this claim. | Other | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The supplied text is only a certificate of correction and does not state the substantive outcome for this claim. | Other | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The supplied text is only a certificate of correction and does not state the substantive outcome for this claim. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.