Case 3311640/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Jones v Vale Curtains and Blinds — 2024
- Case reference
- 3311640/2023
- Decision date
- 4 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reindorf KC
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs M Jones was employed by Vale Curtains and Blinds as a part-time administrator from 6 May 2021 until her dismissal on 19 June 2023. The tribunal accepted that she mistakenly replied to a customer email rather than forwarding it to a colleague, causing an offensive message to be sent to the customer. It found that the customer and his wife then threatened to publicise the incident, including on social media and Trustpilot, and that the principal reason for the decision to dismiss was those threats and the concern about bad publicity, not a conduct-based reason.
The tribunal found that the dismissal decision had effectively already been taken by Mr Johnson and that Mrs Smith then put it into effect. It rejected the respondent's evidence that Mr Gibbons had investigated the matter and found that the process was not a genuine investigation or disciplinary process. The claimant was not given a fair opportunity to be accompanied or to prepare, was not shown the disciplinary policy before the hearing, was not told in advance what rule she had breached, and was denied a real appeal. The tribunal held that the dismissal was outside the range of reasonable responses and therefore unfair.
On remedy, the tribunal held that if a fair procedure had been followed there was no chance the claimant would still have been dismissed, so no Polkey reduction was made. It found 10% contributory fault because the claimant had sent the offensive email and had been careless in replying rather than forwarding it, but it did not treat her refusal to apologise as contributory fault. The claimant's gross weekly pay was £260.77, she had two years' continuous service, and the basic award was calculated at £521.54.
For compensation, the tribunal awarded loss of earnings from dismissal on 19 June 2023 until she started work at the Co-op on 13 November 2023, totalling £5,214.67, plus £300 for loss of statutory rights. It made no award for the later period after she resigned from the Co-op on 21 January 2024, finding that she had not taken reasonable steps to mitigate her loss. After the 10% contributory fault reduction, the compensatory award was £4,963.20 and the total award was £5,484.74.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £5,485 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,485
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £522
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £4,963
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- Burchell test
- range of reasonable responses
- Polkey
- contributory fault
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.