Case 3311642/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A R Bukari v Charlton Alderman Demolition Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3311642/2021
- Decision date
- 8 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rebecca Eeley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A R Bukari
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 11 June 2021 and the respondent did not present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Rebecca Eeley therefore determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that Charlton Alderman Demolition Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Mr A R Bukari's wages. The judgment orders the respondent to pay the claimant £1,036 net. No other remedy components are set out in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The judgment states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and must pay £1,036 net. | Upheld | — | £1,036 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,036
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.