Case 3311653/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Romaniuk v Pivotal Limited and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 3311653/2020
- Decision date
- 17 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis Appearances
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr K Romaniuk
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr K Romaniuk did not attend the hearing held by CVP on 17 September 2021. The respondents, Pivotal Limited and RMS Cash Solutions Limited, were represented by Mr J Cunningham before Employment Judge Anstis.
The written judgment is brief and records only that the claimant’s claim was dismissed. It does not set out findings of fact, liability reasoning, or any separate analysis of the pleaded issues. The record also states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and no remedy findings are set out in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written judgment does not separately identify the pleaded heads of claim or give reasons; this claim type is inferred from the case listing categories rather than stated in the body of the decision. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The written judgment does not separately identify the pleaded heads of claim or give reasons; this claim type is inferred from the case listing categories rather than stated in the body of the decision. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.