Case 3311653/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr Ali, Director — 2023
- Case reference
- 3311653/2021
- Decision date
- 1 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McNeill KC
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Karaburc brought a claim for £2,700 based on an unpaid invoice dated 24 June 2019. The tribunal did not accept that the matter could be pursued as a breach of contract claim under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994, because the claimant did not contend that he was employed under a contract of employment. It instead treated the claim as one for an unauthorised deduction under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal treated the claim as an unauthorised deduction claim under section 13 ERA 1996. It was dismissed as out of time under section 23 ERA 1996, and alternatively because the claimant was not a worker/employee within the meaning of the ERA. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 13 ERA 1996
- section 23 ERA 1996
- not reasonably practicable to bring the claim in time
- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.