Case 3311659/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Lawrence v Tesco Express Whitley Street — 2023
- Case reference
- 3311659/2022
- Decision date
- 11 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Lawrence
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Miss K Lawrence's claim against Tesco Express Whitley Street. By letter dated 18 December 2022, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because she had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 23 October 2022 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Anstis held that the claim should be struck out. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying claim and no monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim in the reasons section; the claim was struck out because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 23 October 2022 and had not actively pursued the claim. The claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.