Case 3311670/2024 · Employment Tribunal
F I Glarentzos v Impact Business Shared Services Ltd (In voluntary liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 3311670/2024
- Decision date
- 17 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Warren Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
F I Glarentzos
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the South East Employment Tribunal on 17 October 2024. The respondent, which is in voluntary liquidation, failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £2,666.67 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, requiring the respondent to pay £510.79 net in damages. The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,969.21 gross.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £5,146.67 in total. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Warren and sent to the parties on 29 September 2025.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages; awarded £2666.67 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,667 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages of £510.79 net. | Upheld | — | £511 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay claimant's holiday entitlement; awarded £1969.21 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,969 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,147
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.