Case 3311683/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v M Kathaluwa Bulathge v Boots Management Services Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3311683/2021
- Decision date
- 23 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy an order dated 6 June 2022, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, explaining why the claim should not be struck out for want of active pursuit. The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 31 October to 3 November 2022 was vacated and would not take place. The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying substantive causes of action, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claims in the extracted text; it records only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. By order dated 6 June 2022, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, but failed to make sufficient representations or to request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.