Case 3311696/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Draper v Asda Bedford Distribution Centre — 2021
- Case reference
- 3311696/2021
- Decision date
- 15 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Draper
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response had been received to the claimant’s claim. Employment Judge Ord therefore recorded that Miss C Draper had been the victim of unlawful discrimination on the grounds of sex, disability and sexual orientation, as alleged in the claim form submitted on 17 June 2021.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | No response was received from the respondent; judgment records that the claimant had been the victim of unlawful discrimination on the grounds of sex as alleged in the claim form. Remedy was to be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | Sex | — |
| Disability discrimination | No response was received from the respondent; judgment records that the claimant had been the victim of unlawful discrimination on the grounds of disability as alleged in the claim form. Remedy was to be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | No response was received from the respondent; judgment records that the claimant had been the victim of unlawful discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation as alleged in the claim form. Remedy was to be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | Sexual orientation | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.