Case 3311707/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Woodward v Pb Donoghue Waste Management — 2023
- Case reference
- 3311707/2021
- Decision date
- 19 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Woodward
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the respondent, Pb Donoghue Waste Management, had made unauthorised deductions of wages and was in breach of contract. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant, Mr A Woodward, the sum of £769, stated to be subject to tax and National Insurance if appropriate.
The written record gives very limited reasons. It says the claimant had claimed £769 and that the respondent had offered £769. No further reasoning, findings of fact, or legal analysis are set out in the published text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions of wages and is ordered to pay £769. The written record does not split the award between claims. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the respondent is in breach of contract and is ordered to pay £769. The written record does not split the award between claims. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £769
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.