Case 3311713/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Daniel v Royal National Orthopaedic NHS Foundation Trust RECORD OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2025
- Case reference
- 3311713/2024
- Decision date
- 22 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Daniel
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a record of a preliminary hearing heard at Watford Employment Tribunal on 22 August 2025 before Employment Judge Quill sitting alone. The claimant, Mr J Daniel, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel, Ms E Margetts.
The tribunal struck out the complaint of breach of contract. The judgment does not set out the substantive basis for the strike out in the extracted text provided, but it records that the breach of contract complaint was dismissed from the proceedings at that stage.
The tribunal stated that the strike out did not affect the other complaints. Separate case management orders were made in relation to those remaining complaints. No monetary award is recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | At the preliminary hearing, the tribunal struck out the complaint of breach of contract. The judgment says this did not affect the other complaints, for which separate case management orders were made. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.