Case 3311731/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Gumpo v WNS Assistance Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3311731/2020
- Decision date
- 22 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Gumpo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal issued a strike out judgment under rule 37. By letter dated 05/02/2021, it gave Miss K Gumpo an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out, because she had not replied to the Tribunal's letter of 15/12/2020 and the claim had not been actively pursued.
Miss Gumpo did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations to avoid strike out, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment was signed by Employment Judge Laidler and sent to the parties on 22/03/2021. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive type of claim; it only records that 'the claim' was struck out. The Tribunal had previously written on 05/02/2021 giving the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing because there had been no reply to the 15/12/2020 letter and the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.