Case 3311741/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Shine v Anesco Ltd Heard by Cloud Video — 2020
- Case reference
- 3311741/2020
- Decision date
- 26 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Shine
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting by Employment Judge Reed on 26 May 2020, recorded that Mr G Shine's discrimination claims against Anesco Ltd were presented out of time. The judgment states that it was not just and equitable for the claims to proceed.
On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the discrimination claims. The written reasons were not provided because reasons had been given orally at the hearing and no request for written reasons was recorded within the judgment text.
The extracted judgment does not set out any separate factual findings on the merits of the underlying complaints, nor does it distinguish between the individual discrimination strands beyond the general reference to discrimination claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The written judgment states that the claimant's discrimination claims were presented out of time and that it was not just and equitable for them to proceed, so they were dismissed. The text does not separate the reasoning by individual discrimination strand. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment states that the claimant's discrimination claims were presented out of time and that it was not just and equitable for them to proceed, so they were dismissed. The text does not separate the reasoning by individual discrimination strand. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | The written judgment states that the claimant's discrimination claims were presented out of time and that it was not just and equitable for them to proceed, so they were dismissed. The text does not separate the reasoning by individual discrimination strand. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- out of time
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.