Case 3311778/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Helen Jeffs v Countrywide Surveyors Limited Heard : by Cloud Video Platform — 2025
- Case reference
- 3311778/2023
- Decision date
- 8 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Evans Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Helen Jeffs
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing on whether Ms Helen Jeffs was a disabled person at the material time for her disability discrimination claim against Countrywide Surveyors Limited. The tribunal found her to be a credible and reliable witness and identified the relevant period as 1 April 2021 to 12 May 2023, during her employment with the respondent.
The tribunal found that all five conditions pleaded or identified in the case management order were present during that period: chronic fatigue syndrome, a sleep disorder, damage to the lower discs in her back/back pain, renal tubular acidosis, and the effects of a prior stroke. It found that each condition had a long-term effect and that the combined and individual effects were more than minor or trivial. The tribunal accepted evidence that fatigue, brain fog, memory problems, pain, lethargy, and sleep disturbance affected day-to-day activities including socialising, shopping, cooking, writing reports, reading, standing, lifting, climbing stairs, driving, walking, and using a computer.
The tribunal rejected the respondent's submission that because Ms Jeffs was able to attend work, the effects were not substantial. It held that she was directing her energies to work and that this did not remove the substantial adverse effect on her wider functioning. It also found that the adverse effects persisted despite medication, so there was no need to decide the alternative treatment question, although it referred to the statutory treatment provision in Schedule 1 paragraph 5(1) Equality Act 2010. The tribunal therefore held that she met the definition of a disabled person within s.6 Equality Act 2010 at the material time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal found that, at the material time in relation to the disability discrimination claim, the claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of s.6 and Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 paragraph 2 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 paragraph 5(1) Equality Act 2010
- s.212(1) Equality Act 2010
- Equality Act 2010 Guidance (2011)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.