Case 3311784/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Chase Collins v Ihod Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3311784/2023
- Decision date
- 22 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Magee REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Chase Collins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Magee, sitting at Bury St Edmunds by CVP on 3 February 2025, considered Mr Chase Collins's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages against iHOD Ltd. The claimant did not attend; the respondent was represented by Mr William Sclater (Solicitor). The Tribunal found the complaint well-founded, holding that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in the period July to October 2023.
The Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £11,600, calculated as the gross sum deducted of £21,600 less £10,000 which had subsequently been repaid. The judgment records that the claimant is responsible for the payment of any tax or National Insurance on the sum.
Reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing; written reasons will only be provided on request made at the hearing or within 14 days of the written record being sent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded for the period July to October 2023. Award is the gross sum deducted (£21,600) less £10,000 subsequently repaid, leaving £11,600 payable. Claimant is responsible for any tax or National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £11,600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,600
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.