Case 3311787/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Denson v Tesco Supermarket — 2025
- Case reference
- 3311787/2024
- Decision date
- 16 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gordon Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Denson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn case 3311787/2024, Miss H Denson's claim against Tesco Supermarket was struck out under rule 38(1)(c) and (d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024. The tribunal recorded that the claimant did not respond to the strike-out warning letter dated 17 September 2025 and that it appeared the claim was not actively pursued.
The tribunal also recorded non-compliance with the Tribunal order dated 17 June 2025. The judgment contains no substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claim and does not identify any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out the claim under rule 38(1)(c) and (d) for non-response to the strike-out warning letter dated 17 September 2025 and failure to comply with the Tribunal order dated 17 June 2025. The judgment text does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 38(1)(c) and (d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.