Case 3311790/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Wynne v And Charles Ross Auctioneers Limited t/a Holloways Auctioneers — 2020
- Case reference
- 3311790/2020
- Decision date
- 18 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Wynne
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the case under Rule 21 after the Respondent stated that no part of the claim was contested. Judgment was therefore entered in favour of the Claimant, Mr J Wynne, against Charles Ross Auctioneers Limited t/a Holloways Auctioneers.
The tribunal awarded a redundancy payment of £1,664, described as 4 years x £416 per week. It also awarded notice pay of £1,664 on the same weekly rate basis.
A further award of £2,080 was made for holiday pay, calculated as 5 weeks x £416 per week. The total ordered to be paid to the Claimant was £5,408.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal recorded that the Respondent stated that no part of the claim was contested and entered judgment for the Claimant. | Upheld | — | £1,664 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay was awarded at £1,664, calculated as 4 years x £416 per week. | Upheld | — | £1,664 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay was awarded at £2,080, calculated as 5 weeks x £416 per week. | Upheld | — | £2,080 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,408
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.