Case 3311797/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Morris v The Tipsy Vegan Limited and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 3311797/2023
- Decision date
- 15 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss R Morris
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the South East Employment Tribunals on 17 October 2023. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined that the claim could properly be decided under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £337.87 gross. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £180.00.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £517.87 in total. The judgment was issued by Employment Judge Quill and dated 15 April 2025.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award of £337.87 gross for unauthorised deductions from wages; determined under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £338 |
| Holiday pay | Award of £180.00 for unpaid holiday entitlement; determined under Rule 21. | Upheld | — | £180 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £518
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.