Case 3311801/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Morris v Clerkin Civils Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3311801/2022
- Decision date
- 26 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Morris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn Mr D Morris v Clerkin Civils Limited, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 19 May 2023 to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claims should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claims. The extracted judgment does not set out the underlying substantive causes of action, and it records no monetary award or other remedy. The judgment is signed by Employment Judge Postle and was sent to the parties on 26 June 2023.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action in the extracted text. It records that the claim in case 3311801/2022 was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action in the extracted text. It records that the claim in case 3311616/2022 was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.