Case 3311803/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Afzal v Inspiralis Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3311803/2024
- Decision date
- 6 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Magee Representation
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Afzal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claim at Norwich on 1 May 2025 before Employment Judge M Magee. The only claim recorded in the judgment was unfair dismissal brought by Ms A Afzal against Inspiralis Limited.
The tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant did not have sufficient service to bring such a claim. On that basis, the claim was not well founded and was dismissed.
No monetary remedy was awarded, and the judgment does not record any separate compensation, basic award, or interest. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant did not have sufficient service to bring such a claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.