Case 3311813/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v KWI Group Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3311813/2022
- Decision date
- 28 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent did not attend and was not represented at the hearing. The Tribunal declared that the Claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded and ordered payment of the gross sum of £5,576.92.
The Tribunal also found that the Respondent failed to pay the Claimant's holiday entitlement, awarding £1,730.76 gross. It found that the Respondent dismissed the Claimant in breach of contract by not giving one week's notice or pay in lieu, and awarded £485.57 net as damages.
The Claimant's unfair dismissal claim succeeded. The Tribunal made a Basic Award of £4,282.50, bringing the total award to £12,075.75. Written reasons were not included because reasons had been given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal declared the unauthorised deductions from wages complaint well-founded and awarded the gross sum stated. | Upheld | — | £5,577 |
| Holiday pay | The Tribunal found the Respondent failed to pay the Claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded the gross sum stated. | Upheld | — | £1,731 |
| Breach of contract | The Tribunal found dismissal in breach of contract for failure to give one week's notice or pay in lieu, and awarded damages in the net sum stated. | Upheld | — | £486 |
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment records that the unfair dismissal claim succeeded and makes a Basic Award in the stated amount. | Upheld | — | £4,283 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,076
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,283
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.