Case 3311817/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Michael Wright v Heritage Automative Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3311817/2020
- Decision date
- 29 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Michael Wright
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr Michael Wright's complaint of disability discrimination against Heritage Automative Limited was dismissed because the claimant withdrew it. No substantive liability findings or remedy awards are recorded in relation to that claim.
The tribunal also dealt with an age discrimination claim by directing the claimant to confirm in writing, within 14 days, the basis on which that claim was being presented. The judgment states that if he did not do so, the claim would stand dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. The document does not record a final merits outcome for the age discrimination claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The claimant's complaint of disability discrimination was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Age discrimination | The tribunal ordered the claimant to confirm in writing within 14 days the basis on which the age discrimination claim was being presented. The judgment stated that if he failed to do so, the claim would stand dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant; no final dismissal is recorded in this judgment. | Other | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.