Case 3311818/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Thornhill v Ahearne Personnel Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3311818/2020
- Decision date
- 4 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lewis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Thornhill
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found that Ahearne Personnel Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr A Thornhill's wages and therefore upheld the unlawful deduction from wages claim. The judgment ordered the respondent to pay £1,326.90 gross, with the claimant responsible for tax and national insurance.
In the reasons, Employment Judge Quill recorded that no response had been received by 1 December 2020. The claimant quantified the claim by email on 31 January 2021. The respondent later purported to submit a response on 4 March 2021, but the tribunal noted that it was not on the required form and that the application for an extension of time would not be considered until a valid form was submitted. Although the respondent said it would post the form on 26 March 2021, no valid form or additional reasons for an extension were received, and the tribunal concluded it was appropriate to issue judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,326.90 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,327 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,327
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.