Case 3311820/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Katarzyna Augustyn v Clements Limited (in Administration) — 2026
- Case reference
- 3311820/2023
- Decision date
- 24 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gordon Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Katarzyna Augustyn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Katarzyna Augustyn's claim against Clements (Terrington) Ltd under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The Tribunal had written to the claimant on 17 February 2026 warning that it was considering strike-out because she appeared not to have complied with an Order dated 25 February 2024. The letter invited an explanation or a request for a hearing, but the claimant did not reply.
Employment Judge Gordon Walker was satisfied that the grounds for strike-out applied and that strike-out accorded with the overriding objective in Rule 3. The reasons recorded were that the claimant was not actively pursuing the claim, the respondent company was dissolved, and the claim was almost three years old. The judgment does not identify the individual causes of action or record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole but does not identify or adjudicate the individual causes of action. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- overriding objective in Rule 3
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.