Case 3311854/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v M & DH Insurance Services Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3311854/2020
- Decision date
- 1 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment, heard remotely by CVP at Watford on 1 March 2022 before Employment Judge de Silva QC, records a single finding on disability status. The tribunal found that Leigh Foster was a disabled person during the course of his employment with M & DH Insurance Services Limited for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010.
The written record does not set out any further liability findings, does not record any award, and states that reasons were given orally at the hearing. It also notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment records only a finding that the claimant was a disabled person during the course of employment for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. It does not record any separate liability determination or remedy in the written record. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.