Case 3311877/2022 · Employment Tribunal
1. Mr Mohamad Zeeshan Akhtar 2. Mr Jaques Webb-Jones v Mr Adam Noble and 2 others — 2023
- Case reference
- 3311877/2022
- Decision date
- 24 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
4 namedClaimant
1. Mr Mohamad Zeeshan Akhtar 2. Mr Jaques Webb-Jones
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Norwich on 11 July 2023 before Employment Judge M Warren. Neither the Claimants nor the Respondents attended. The judgment records that the Claimants' claims were dismissed because they had not been actively pursued.
No substantive findings on the underlying merits of the pleaded claims are recorded in the judgment text provided. The decision does not set out any award, liability findings, or remedy calculation, and the only stated basis for disposal was non-pursuit of the claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed because the claim was not actively pursued. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because the claim was not actively pursued. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Dismissed because the claim was not actively pursued. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.