Case 3311881/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Laidlaw v Everest Security Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3311881/2022
- Decision date
- 21 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Laidlaw
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 21 September 2022. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal ordered Everest Security Limited to pay Mr B Laidlaw £150.00 in respect of unpaid expenses. The extracted judgment does not set out any further findings on liability, and no separate remedy components are identified beyond the single payment ordered.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment is a Rule 21 default judgment and does not set out the underlying pleaded cause of action in detail. Classification as unlawful deduction from wages follows the GOV.UK listing for this case and the award for unpaid expenses. | Upheld | — | £150 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £150
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.