Case 3311915/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Herself, as a Litigant in Person For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 3311915/2023
- Decision date
- 23 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Conley Appearances
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Herself, as a Litigant in Person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment concerned the claimant's application to amend her existing claims. The original claim included ordinary unfair dismissal and direct race discrimination, and the claimant sought to add allegations concerning protected disclosures and disability discrimination.
The tribunal refused the amendment to add a whistleblowing claim. It found that the alleged disclosures were not included in the detailed original claim despite being matters within the claimant's knowledge, that there had been substantial delay, and that allowing the amendment would cause prejudice to the respondent.
The tribunal allowed the amendment only to the limited extent of a disability discrimination claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments. It noted that the original claim contained some reference to the claimant's mental ill health, but that further case management would be needed because the reasonable adjustments claim still lacked particularity.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The claimant's application to amend to add a protected disclosure/whistleblowing claim was refused. The judgment did not determine the merits of a substantive whistleblowing claim. | Other | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The application to amend was allowed only in relation to a disability discrimination claim based on failure to make reasonable adjustments. The merits of that claim were not determined. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- Selkent Bus Company Ltd v Moore
- s.111 Employment Rights Act 1996
- London Underground Ltd v Noel
- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Local Health Board v Morgan
- Vaughan v Modality Partnership
- Foxtons Ltd v Ruwiel
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.