Case 3311923/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Paul Rosher v Barnes Rosher Office Supplies Limited (In Liquidation) and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 3311923/2024
- Decision date
- 4 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Magee Representation
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr Paul Rosher
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge M Magee, sitting at Norwich Employment Tribunal by CVP on 2 May 2025, declared that the Claimant was an employee of the First Respondent, Barnes Rosher Office Supplies Limited (In Liquidation), at the material time. The First Respondent did not appear; the Second Respondent, the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, was represented by Ms Munro as a lay representative, and the Claimant appeared in person.
By agreement between the parties, the tribunal made a Declaration that the Second Respondent shall pay the Claimant the sum of £19,724.84 (less deductions). This figure comprises a redundancy payment of £12,698.40, notice pay of £5,079.36 (subject to tax and National Insurance deductions), and holiday pay of £1,947.08 (subject to tax and National Insurance deductions).
Reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The judgment was approved on 15 May 2025 and sent to the parties on 4 June 2025.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment of £12,698.40 declared payable by the Secretary of State by agreement between the parties. | Upheld | — | £12,698 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay of £5,079.36 (subject to tax and National Insurance deductions) declared payable by the Secretary of State by agreement. | Upheld | — | £5,079 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay of £1,947.08 (subject to tax and National Insurance deductions) declared payable by the Secretary of State by agreement. | Upheld | — | £1,947 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £19,724
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.