Case 3311925/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr P Bain, solicitor — 2024
- Case reference
- 3311925/2023
- Decision date
- 19 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Isabel Manley
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim before Employment Judge Isabel Manley at Watford on 19 July 2024 was a breach of contract claim brought by Mr J Amidu against Miniclipper Limited. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr P Bain, solicitor.
The tribunal held that the breach of contract claim had no reasonable prospect of success and struck it out. The judgment records that there were no remaining claims after that decision.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had behaved unreasonably in pursuing the claim and ordered him to pay £1,500 as a contribution towards the respondent's costs. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons would be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the breach of contract claim had no reasonable prospect of success and was struck out. The £1,500 order was made as a contribution towards the respondent's costs, not as a remedy on the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.