Case 3311943/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend and was not represented. For the v The Premier Academy — 2021
- Case reference
- 3311943/2020
- Decision date
- 11 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did not attend and was not represented. For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was listed for a hearing at Bury St Edmunds by CVP on 10 June 2021 before Employment Judge Laidler. The claimant did not attend and was not represented. The respondent was represented by Miss H Smith, HR Representative.
No substantive determination is recorded in the judgment. The only decision set out is that the hearing was adjourned to a date to be fixed, with a time estimate of 3 hours before a Judge sitting alone. The record also states that the matter was not reserved to Employment Judge Laidler.
The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No findings on liability, remedy, or the underlying claim were included in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not determine any substantive claim. It records only that the hearing was adjourned to a date to be fixed, with a time estimate of 3 hours before a Judge sitting alone. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.