Case 3311947/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Nicholas v Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy — 2021
- Case reference
- 3311947/2020
- Decision date
- 2 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maxwell Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Nicholas
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented claims ticking race discrimination, sex discrimination and arrears of pay. The respondent denied that the claimant was or had been its employee or contractor and sought strike out on the basis that the claims disclosed no basis on which they could be pursued against it in the Employment Tribunal.
The claimant argued that the respondent was her covert or unseen employer because, in broad terms, its general and specific actions affected her employment by others, prevented her from obtaining employment, and interfered with other aspects of her life. The Tribunal recorded that her previous employers did not include the respondent and that she did not say she had entered into a contract with the respondent, or that she had been supplied by a third party to work for it.
The Tribunal held that the claimant had no reasonable prospect of showing she was an employee or worker of the respondent under the Employment Rights Act 1996, or an applicant, employee, contract worker, or otherwise within a relevant provision of the Equality Act 2010. It therefore found it would have no jurisdiction to determine the claims and struck them out.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The race discrimination claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(a) because the Tribunal found the claimant had no reasonable prospect of establishing jurisdiction under the Equality Act 2010 against this respondent. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | The sex discrimination claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(a) because the Tribunal found the claimant had no reasonable prospect of establishing jurisdiction under the Equality Act 2010 against this respondent. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The wages claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(a) because the Tribunal found the claimant had no reasonable prospect of establishing that she was an employee or worker of the respondent for the purposes of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- rule 37(1)(a) Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
- no reasonable prospect of success
- North Glamorgan NHS Trust v Ezsias
- rule 39(1) Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
- Van Rensburg v Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames
- section 230 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 83 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.