Case 3311949/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr P Maratos, Peninsula Consultant — 2022
- Case reference
- 3311949/2020
- Decision date
- 19 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Members
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Mr D Sagar, Ms I Sood
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Watford on 16 to 19 May 2022, before Employment Judge R Lewis sitting with Mr D Sagar and Ms I Sood, the tribunal determined claims brought by Ms I Pelle against Digital Grading Studio Limited. The written record records that the claimant succeeded on holiday pay, notice pay, unfair dismissal and sex discrimination, and failed on redundancy payment, disability discrimination and equal pay.
The tribunal upheld the holiday pay claim and ordered payment of £290.64 net. It also upheld the notice pay claim and ordered payment of one month’s notice pay of £1,532.48 net. The redundancy payment claim was dismissed.
The unfair dismissal claim succeeded. The tribunal stated that no basic award was payable and made a compensatory award of £1,166.24. The disability discrimination claims failed and were dismissed, and the equal pay claim also failed and was dismissed.
The sex discrimination claim was upheld, but remedy was left to a separate hearing. The total sum payable under this judgment was £2,989.36. The record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim upheld; respondent ordered to pay the net sum of £290.64 in respect of holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £291 |
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay upheld; respondent ordered to pay one month's notice pay of £1,532.48 net. | Upheld | — | £1,532 |
| Redundancy | Claim for a redundancy payment failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim succeeded; no basic award was payable and a compensatory award of £1,166.24 was ordered. | Upheld | — | £1,166 |
| Disability discrimination | Claims of disability discrimination failed and were dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Equal pay | Equal pay claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Sex discrimination claim was upheld; remedy was to be decided at a separate hearing. | Upheld | Sex | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,989
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £1,166
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.