Case 3312010/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Tanner Brodin Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3312010/2022
- Decision date
- 1 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was given under Rule 21 on remedy after the respondent did not attend and was not represented. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,676.00.
The tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages for 9 weeks' notice, totalling £1,924.56. It also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,779.92.
The tribunal awarded a 25% uplift of £1,290.08 because the respondent failed to follow any procedure in the lead up to the claimant's redundancy. The total award stated in the judgment was £8,126.40.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £2,780 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages and orders payment of the gross sum awarded. | Upheld | — | £1,676 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards damages for 9 weeks' notice. | Upheld | — | £1,925 |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment awards a 25% uplift for the respondent's failure to follow any procedure in the lead up to the claimant's redundancy. The judgment does not separately set out a detailed unfair dismissal liability finding, so this classification is based on the procedural redundancy finding and listed claim category. | Upheld | — | £1,290 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,126
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 - Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.