Case 3312029/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Willgress v Total Home Delivery Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3312029/2024
- Decision date
- 11 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gordon Walker
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Willgress
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard at Norwich Employment Tribunal by CVP on 11 September 2025 before Employment Judge Gordon Walker sitting alone. The claimant represented himself and the respondent did not attend and had not presented a response. The judge was satisfied that the claim form had been sent to an appropriate address (the office and warehouse from which the claimant worked) and that notice of the hearing had been sent to the respondent's registered address, and proceeded to determine the claim on the information provided by the claimant under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024.
The tribunal found the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 well founded and ordered the respondent to pay unpaid wages of £2001.60, accrued but untaken holiday of £2001.60 and notice pay of £3892. The tribunal also found the claim for a redundancy payment under section 135 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 well founded and ordered a redundancy payment of £7245 calculated in accordance with section 162.
The total amount ordered to be paid by the respondent to the claimant within 14 days was £15,140.20. Written reasons were not provided as reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the claim under Employment Rights Act 1996 section 13 well founded. Award comprises unpaid wages (£2001.60), accrued but untaken holiday (£2001.60) and notice pay (£3892), all grouped by the tribunal under the unauthorised deductions claim. | Upheld | — | £7,895 |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claim for a redundancy payment under Employment Rights Act 1996 section 135 well founded, with the payment calculated in accordance with section 162. | Upheld | — | £7,245 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,140
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- rule 16 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024
- rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024
- Employment Rights Act 1996 section 13
- Employment Rights Act 1996 section 135
- Employment Rights Act 1996 section 162
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.