Case 3312032/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Lewis v Green Cuisine Food Products Ltd and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 3312032/2022
- Decision date
- 15 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Members
- Panel members
- Ms J Schiebler, Ms J Nicholas
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss N Lewis
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Norwich heard the case on 12, 13 and 14 December 2023 before Regional Employment Judge Foxwell with lay members Ms J Schiebler and Ms J Nicholas. Miss N Lewis appeared in person and the respondents were represented by Mr Baker. The written record states only the tribunal's dispositive findings, and both sets of claims were dismissed.
The claimant's claims of being subjected to detriments contrary to sections 44 and 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996 were held not well-founded. The tribunal also rejected the claimant's claims of constructive automatic unfair dismissal contrary to section 100 and/or section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996. No monetary award or other remedy is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Claims for detriments contrary to sections 44 and 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996 were found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Claims of constructive automatic unfair dismissal contrary to section 100 and/or section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 were found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- ss.44 and 47B ERA 1996
- s.100 ERA 1996
- s.103A ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.