Mr A O Faniyan v Serco Limited — 2025

Case reference: 3312032/2023
Decision date: 30 July 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Graham
Panel members: Mrs C Smith, Ms E Deem

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr A O Faniyan

Respondent

Serco Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal recorded that the claimant's complaints of failure to implement reasonable adjustments and direct race discrimination were dismissed upon withdrawal.

The remaining complaint, discrimination arising from disability, failed and was dismissed. The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and does not set out further written reasoning or findings.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

This case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	The complaint of failure to implement reasonable adjustments was dismissed upon withdrawal.	Withdrawn	Disability	—
Race discrimination	The complaint of direct race discrimination was dismissed upon withdrawal.	Withdrawn	Race	—
Disability discrimination	The complaint of discrimination arising from disability failed and was dismissed.	Dismissed	Disability	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.