Case 3312041/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Stefania Ziembinska v The Daughters of Divine Charity — 2021
- Case reference
- 3312041/2020
- Decision date
- 21 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Allen
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Stefania Ziembinska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary jurisdiction hearing before Employment Judge Allen sitting alone at Watford by CVP on 20 August 2021. The claimant did not attend; Mrs Black, described as a workplace colleague and friend, attended for her. The tribunal noted that the claim form alleged unfair dismissal, redundancy and unauthorised deductions from wages arising from the end of the claimant's work at the respondent's school, but the hearing was limited to whether the claims had been presented in time.
The tribunal took 31 August 2019, the date the claimant said she was made redundant, as the relevant date for time-limit purposes. On that basis, the three-month limitation period for unfair dismissal and unlawful deductions expired on 30 November 2019. For redundancy pay, the tribunal held that the period for the steps in s.164 ERA 1996 expired on 29 February 2020, but the claim presented on 28 September 2020 was still out of time.
The tribunal considered whether it was not reasonably practicable to present the claims in time and whether a further reasonable period should be allowed. Applying the checklist derived from British Coal Corporation v Keeble, it noted the length of the delay, the claimant's explanation that she had been waiting for her religious order to negotiate a transfer to the primary school, the likely effect of delay on witness recollection, the lack of relevant information requests to the respondent, the claimant's limited promptness, and the evidence that she had sought advice from various sources including ACAS, Citizens Advice Bureau and a solicitor who declined to take the case.
Having weighed those matters, the tribunal found there were no reasonable grounds to extend the statutory time limits. It therefore held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the claims and struck them out under Rule 21. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Presented about 13 months after the relevant date of 31 August 2019; tribunal held it was out of time and refused to extend time. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | Presented out of time; tribunal found no reasonable grounds to exercise discretion to extend the statutory time limits under s.164 ERA 1996. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Presented about 13 months after the relevant date of 31 August 2019; tribunal held it was out of time and refused to extend time. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.111(2) ERA 1996
- s.164 ERA 1996
- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.207B ERA 1996
- British Coal Corporation v Keeble
- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.