Case 3312047/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. K Griffiths v RTS Group — 2022
- Case reference
- 3312047/2021
- Decision date
- 15 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. K Griffiths
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remedy judgment in which Employment Judge Buckley, sitting at Watford by CVP on 15 November 2022, recorded that the respondent did not appear and had filed no response. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £720 for breach of contract, identified as unpaid notice pay.
The tribunal also ordered payment of £3,935.87 for unlawful deductions from wages. That sum was made up of £2,991.35 for unpaid wages, £525 for unpaid holiday pay, and £1,545.52 for unpaid expenses, subject to a deduction of £1,126 for payments already made by the employer.
The tribunal recorded that the recoupment regulations did not apply. The bottom-line monetary outcome from the judgment is £4,655.87, being the combined amount of the breach of contract award and the unlawful deductions award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Unpaid notice pay awarded. | Upheld | — | £720 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award comprised £2,991.35 unpaid wages, £525 unpaid holiday pay and £1,545.52 unpaid expenses, subject to deduction of payments made by the employer of £1,126. | Upheld | — | £3,936 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,656
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.