Case 3312060/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person. For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 3312060/2022
- Decision date
- 12 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Brown Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person. For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a procedural judgment in which the respondent, Network Rail Limited, applied for strike out of the claimant's claims. Employment Judge L Brown, sitting at Cambridge, recorded that the application failed and was dismissed. The claimant, Mr Jeff Martins, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel, Mr Singer.
The extract contains no determination of the substantive merits of the underlying claims, no award of compensation, and no indication that any claim was dismissed on the merits. It records only that the strike out application was unsuccessful and that the judgment was sent to the parties on 12 July 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The respondent applied for strike out of the claimant's claims. The application failed and was dismissed. The extract does not identify the underlying claims or any merits decision on them. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.