Case 3312119/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Score v Intergas Heating Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3312119/2020
- Decision date
- 28 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Michell
- Venue
- Cambridge
- Panel members
- Mr Brian Smith, Mr Colin Davie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Score
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Cambridge heard the case on 26, 27 and 28 September 2022 before Employment Judge Michell with Mr Brian Smith and Mr Colin Davie. It found that Mr R Score had been unfairly dismissed by Intergas Heating Limited contrary to s.94(1) ERA 1996. It also found that his complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages under s.13 ERA 1996 was well founded.
Although unfair dismissal was upheld, the tribunal made no basic or compensatory award in respect of the dismissal, citing ss.122(2), 124(1) and/or 123(6) ERA 1996. It ordered the respondent to pay £1,877.83 for the unlawful deduction from wages. The judgment states that all other claims were dismissed, but the written record does not identify the residual claim type(s) separately.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed contrary to s.94(1) ERA 1996, but made no basic or compensatory award in respect of the dismissal by reason of ss.122(2), 124(1) and/or 123(6) ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages under s.13 ERA 1996 well founded and ordered the respondent to pay £1,877.83. | Upheld | — | £1,878 |
| Other | The judgment states that all other claims are dismissed, but the written record does not identify the residual claim type(s) separately. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,878
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.94(1) ERA 1996
- s.13 ERA 1996
- ss.122(2), 124(1) and/or 123(6) ERA 1996
- Yorkshire Maintenance Company Ltd v Farr EAT 0084/09
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.